It was necessary!

Depicts the internal conflict between doing whatever we want or following ethical guidelines.

Once upon a time, a group of people got together to decide on some guidelines for what was unacceptable and what wasn’t. They came up with a set of very basic rules to constitute ethics that supposedly applied to everything. Deceiving someone was unethical. Doing something to someone without previously getting their consent was unethical. Inflicting physical or psychological harm upon someone was unethical. However, these rules are constantly being overlooked by different groups of people for different reasons.

Severe Shock
The fake shock generator used by Milgram in his study.

Sometimes psychologists ignore ethical guidelines in their experiments to increase the study’s internal or external validity, or because they want to study a particularly sensitive issue. Their argument would be that the benefits derived from the results of their study would greatly surpass the harm that may come to their participants. Milgram’s study of obedience is an example of an unethically conducted experiment that provided great insight into the human nature. This controversial experiment revealed the extent to which humans are willing to go in order to obey a figure of authority. In it, Milgram used a cover story to maintain psychological realism. He did this by deceiving his participants, telling them that it was a study on learning and punishment. He also failed to get informed consent from the participants, as they didn’t know the true nature of the study beforehand, due to the cover story used. However the greatest issue was the physical and psychological harm that came to them as a result of it. Throughout the experiment, the participants experienced symptoms of great discomfort due to the pressure, including trembling, sweating and hysterical laughter. A few even had full on seizures! On top of all that, they had to live the rest of their lives thinking that they would have been capable of harming another human being for no reason. This was a problem because it decreased the participants’ self-esteem, making them question if the really are as good as they had previously believed. However, they were debriefed at the end, and told about the overwhelming effects of social influence and the power of the situation to help explain their behaviour. But there still might have been negative effects on their self-perception. This may all seem terrible, however it was necessary to the experiment. Had the participants been told the true nature of the experiment, they may have displayed demand characteristics, thereby completely falsifying the results and leading to a low internal validity. Also, the intensity of the situation was required to make it seem realistic and therefore provide a high external validity.

Many were killed in this battle during WWII. Was this ethical?

So when is it ethical to overlook ethical guidelines? Is it ethical to harm people during a war? What kinds of people is it ethical to harm during a war? Is the use of chemical or biological weapons ethical? How about nuclear weapons? The Milgram obedience study didn’t just raise questions about human nature, but also about ethics. It showed us an example of when it was considered ok to ignore the agreed upon ethical guidelines. But was it ok?

Works cited:

Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral Study of Obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology.


3 thoughts on “It was necessary!

  1. I agree with you that at some point, psychologists have to sacrifice some(not all) of their ethical values for the sake of a major scientific discoveries. I mean, think about it, if Milgrim had not conducted his experiment the way he did, we might not have had the valuable knowledge about the effect of obedience and how far people will go upon the orders of an authority figure. It’s still a tricky subject, though.

  2. You’re right, it is a very tricky subject. I think one of the reasons we don’t see any recent groundbreaking discoveries in social psychology is due to the fact that the ethical guidelines are actually taken more seriously and enforced nowadays. This kind of ties the hands of many psychologists, as they are not able to freely conduct their experiments.

  3. Honestly as much as I believe that informing the participants of the experiment would have ruined the whole purpose but it doesn’t excuse his actions. He could have done it in a different way. For example, there are rules where a child or a pregnant woman etc cannot consent for themselves, therefore they could have used participants who could not consent and gotten permission from other people for them. I know this does not absolutely make it ethical but I mean something similar ..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s